Considerations for a Federal Security Compliance and Risk Management Program

Compliance with the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) can be challenging due to the broad scope of technical standards specified by NIST. The security framework in SP 800-53 includes 17 areas of security covering 205 technical and program management controls. Mapping these to IT operations of a large federal agency, implementation, and ongoing management is a huge process. To help, PacketViper has mapped 20 critical SANS controls for effective cyber defense. These specific recommendations are viewed effectively in blocking currently known high-priority attacks, as well as those attack types expected in the near future.

See below how PacketViper offers solutions to help federal agencies and contractors be compliant.

Limitation and Control of Network Ports, Protocols and Switches

NIST Special Publication 800-53 r4 Controls: AT-1,2,3,4 – SA-11,16 – PM-13,14,16

Allow remote access only to legitimate users and services. Apply host-based firewalls and port-filtering and scanning tools to block traffic that is not explicitly allowed. Properly configure web servers, mail servers, file and print services, and domain name system (DNS) servers to limit remote access. Disable automatic installation of unnecessary software components. Move servers inside the firewall unless remote access is required for business purposes

Limitation and control of network ports is primarily accomplished with the discovery of traffic flowing through the perimeter environment.  This is achieved by using tools such as:

  • Home Screen dashboard widgets
  • Summary and scheduling reporting
  • Searchable log filterings with linked IP context
  • Advanced Analytics
  • Web and Mail Analyzers
  •  Virtual Minefield sensors

PacketViper Advanced Analytics

 

PacketViper can regularly generate reports and sensor data including time, network ports, protocols, countries, companies, and associated networks found.  A record of each discovery is kept within PacketViper for a period of time designated by the customer or forwarded to 3rd party logging system (example: Splunk, LogRythm, etc.)

PacketViper can correlate connection traffic against any country, company, network, and IP using time criteria within our Advanced Analytics module. PacketViper can ingest converted network captures from sources, such as PCAP, to correlate the captured data within Advanced Analytics module. Virtual Minefield Zones and Sensors can detect unusual or unauthorized network activity including, but are not limited, the following:

  • Critical Host Volume
  • Scans and probes
  • Time schedule Violations
  • Port Activity Rates
  • Unusual Port Activity
  • Unusual Network Volume
  • Geographical Region, Company, or Network
  • Direction

Triggers

Use PacketViper dashboards to view, in real time, live traffic with time stamp source and destination country, company, and IP.  Each view is hyperlinked to our patented NetCheck which provides the full IP context of data capable of geographically isolating any part of the traffic by IP, company, or country.  

Boundary Defense

NIST Special Publication 800-53 r4 Controls: AC-4,17,20  – CA-3,7,9 – CM-2 – SA-9 – SC-4, 7 – SI-4

Control the flow of traffic through network borders and police content by looking for attacks and evidence of compromised machines. Establish multi-layered boundary defenses by relying on firewalls, proxies, demilitarized zone (DMZ) perimeter networks and other network-based tools. Filter inbound and outbound traffic, including traffic through business partner networks (“extranets”).

Deny communications with or limit the data flow to known malicious IP addresses (blacklists), or limit access only to trusted sites (whitelists). Tests can be periodically carried out by sending packets from bogon source IP addresses (un-routable or otherwise unused IP addresses) into the network to verify they are not transmitted through network perimeters. Lists of bogon addresses are publicly available on the Internet from various sources and indicate a series of IP addresses that should not be used for legitimate traffic traversing the Internet. To control the flow of traffic through network borders, and to police content by looking for attacks and evidence of compromised machines, boundary defenses should be multi-layered—relying on firewalls, proxies, and DMZ perimeter networks as well as network based IPS and IDS. It is also critical to filter both inbound and outbound traffic.

PacketViper can granularly control, regulate, and identify traffic geographically by rate, direction and time. You can also identify by country, company, network and IP.  By filtering the key aspects identified, port and protocol filters will significantly reduce the activity and unwanted traffic through the security perimeter.  This method reduces traffic congestion and the amount of loads which in return provides better visibility to enhance current security postures.

 

PacketViper can specifically control boundaries of internal, external, and cross connected networks. This can be done geographically by rate, time, company, network or IP for any connected devices.

 

PacketViper can analyze, alert, and filter traffic destined or received from dump servers, command and control machines or bots. Our Virtual Minefields can gather intelligence while detecting newly infected bots, proxy attempts, probes/scans and flooding.

Advanced Analytics Reports

About FISMA

FISMA is part of the E-Government Act of 2002. Its provisions fall into three major categories: assessment, enforcement, and compliance.

Assessment pertains to determining the adequacy of the security of federal assets.

Enforcement requires that key information security provisions be implemented and managed.

Compliance establishes provisions for the management of each agency’s information security program and the accountability of each agency for compliance and reporting.

FISMA directs the National Institute of Standards and Technologies (NIST) to create and manage technical standards for compliance. Key standards include NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-53 and Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) 199 and 200. Audits for FISMA compliance are managed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Why FISMA Matters to Your Organization

Threats to federal systems and critical cyber infrastructures come from sovereign states, terrorists, criminals, lone hackers, and mistakes committed by staff and contractors. A successful exploit would be disastrous if it were to stop or stall vital functions of government or critical services.

If a federal agency fails to comply with FISMA, it may be sanctioned via a budget cut. Contractors that exchange data with federal information systems must also comply with FISMA or risk termination from a contract. Non-compliance may preclude contractors from bidding on future federal contracts.

From Our Blog

  • Vendor Risk – Times are a Changin’

    Vendor RiskVendor Risk is a relatively new anomaly. I sometimes wonder how we ever got through the 90’s. It seems like only a few years ago when vendors received a key, code, or swipe card to come through the front door of our buildings whenever they liked. We trusted them to do their job once inside. I … Continue reading >>>

  • Take password protection seriously and practice what you preach

    password protectionOver the past several weeks I have been practicing what I preach about password protection. I changed all my passwords to each of my online accounts to a unique password with a minimum of 20 random characters. I thought this would be a fairly simple thing to do. I decided on a common password manager, … Continue reading >>>

  • FOR SALE:  A much smaller cybersecurity haystack

    Cybersecurity HaystacksIt’s budget season. For enterprise cybersecurity teams that means getting ready to ask for more. In most cases, not enough, but definitely more budget to find the needles in the haystacks. And most likely, more of the same stuff you already have. Far too many cybersecurity leaders are going to ask their executive teams for drastically … Continue reading >>>

  • It’s time to take a different approach to utilizing threat intelligence

    network defenseThreat Intelligence has gotten a lot of attention in the last few years. What is it? Who understands it? Is it actionable?  Plus think about the substantial investment for security organizations to create such a perishable good and then actually using it to protect a network can be complicated. Don’t forget the numerous reports about … Continue reading >>>

  • A Paradigm Shift for Cybersecurity Managed Service Providers

    PacketViper Partner ProgramShifts in the current cybersecurity service provider market somewhat resemble an episode of the infamous game show Wheel of Fortune, where contestants purchase letters to capitalize and prosper on the show. We’ve seen Managed Service Providers (MSPs) “buy an S”, or invest heavily in their businesses in order to become a Managed Security Service Provider … Continue reading >>>

  • Hackers For Hire

    In today’s society, when someone speaks of a “hacker”, we automatically assume that the person was trying to do something illegal and perform a major scam or breach into a network. The term “hacker” stirs up controversy among organizations and leaves a sore-spot with many. What if there was a solution… Are there good hackers today? If you answered “YES”, then you answered correctly.

  • The Insanities of Network Security

    Thinking you have to allow every connection to every open network port. Thinking because you have a VPN portal it’s secure. Thinking your a IDS isn’t based on variables on the past, and can predict the future. Thinking you won’t be chasing your tail over and over on false positives, and will not become jaded. … Continue reading >>>

  • Irony of Network Security

    As I read through articles on the latest security threats, breaches, door opening exploits, and vulnerabilities that left doors opened. I Ironically see a firewall ad next to the security article saying ‘The Complete Firewall Solution, Get Total Visibility Into Your Security”. The article in Reuters explained how many security systems found they were susceptible … Continue reading >>>